Private beta · now onboarding Corporate & M&A

Skip the
first pass.

Ciceri reads every document in the data room overnight. Categorized, extracted, every answer pinned to the passage it came from. Spend the time on judgment, not filing.

Any deal size, carve-out or take-private, same workflow Every answer cited to the source passage Always a lawyer on the final call
DEFAULT TAXONOMY

13 categories tuned to corporate & M&A diligence: Material Contracts; Company, Structure, Corporate & Regulatory; Finance & Strategy; Labor & Employee Matters (including benefit plans); Taxes; Intellectual Property; IT & Software; Data Protection (privacy & security); Real & Personal Property; Legal; Insurance; Marketing; Other. Rename them, restructure them, or swap in your firm's own. The categories are yours.

The Problem

Diligence on a real deal looks like this. Thousands of documents land in a data room over a weekend. A few hundred on a small carve-out; ten thousand on a take-private. By Monday, three lawyers on the deal team have a checklist, a coffee pot, and ten days to signing.

They will spend most of that runway doing what is, in practice, a first pass: opening every file, deciding what it is, where it goes, what to flag, what to skip.

It is necessary work. It does not require a J.D., and it should not be billed at the rate of one.

What changes for your team

Same Tuesday.
Different week.

Pick any buyer-side deal. Same Tuesday morning, same data-room drop. The week that follows looks nothing alike.

Tuesday · without Ciceri
9 daysfrom data room to partner-ready disclosure schedule
06:00 Data room dropped at 02:14 AM. 1,247 documents in a tree of folders.
07:30 Open the first 40 PDFs. Sort into folders. Type filenames into a shared tracker.
11:30 Halfway through material contracts. Still typing party names into the index.
15:00 Indemnity caps into a comparison chart, by hand. Contract by contract, retyped.
19:00 Start the change-of-control flag pass. Eight contracts in before dinner.
23:30 Status update to the partner: roughly 40% through. Will circulate a first-cut index in the morning.
Tuesday · with Ciceri
9 hoursfrom data room to partner-ready disclosure schedule
08:45 Open Ciceri: 1,247 documents indexed overnight. 1,239 categorized. 8 sit in the review queue because Ciceri wasn't confident; a human sets those.
10:00 Spot-check the flagged items. Confirm or override. Total time: 12 minutes.
11:00 Draft the disclosure schedule. Pull counterparty + indemnity caps by clause type. Every value cited.
13:30 Ask the deal: “agreements assignable without consent, newest first.” The agent builds the filter; every row comes back cited.
15:00 Change-of-control review. Filtered list, 23 contracts. Read the consequential ones; skip the routine.
17:00 Disclosure schedule v1 to partner. Spend the evening negotiating reps, baskets, and the indemnification survival period.
How it works

Three things,
done on every document.

Upload the data room. Ciceri does the first pass: it sorts every document into your taxonomy, lifts the fields you care about, and stamps every output with a citation back to the source. Your team picks up at the part that requires a lawyer.

01 — Categorize

Every document, sorted into your firm's taxonomy.

Ciceri reads each file end-to-end and classifies it against your category tree. Ambiguous documents surface in a review queue with the suggested category and why. Set a category by hand and Ciceri won't overwrite it. Not on the next run, not ever.

Your taxonomy · your hierarchy · your rules
02 — Extract

The fields you would have typed, already in the spreadsheet.

Define a field once, whether that's counterparty, governing law, term, or indemnity cap, and Ciceri lifts it from every document of that type. Export to Excel. Hand it to the deal team. Drop it into the disclosure schedule.

Define once · every document in the deal
03 — Cite

Every answer pinned to the passage it came from.

Every extracted value carries its source: where it sits in the document, and the exact passage behind it. Read the quote beside the answer, or open the document and check it in context. Nothing has to be taken on faith.

AI that cites its work
What you actually see

Two surfaces.
Both built for review.

A document view that shows the answer and the proof beside it. A request list that knows what's checked off and what's still outstanding, by category, by counterparty, by partner.

Master Services Agreement — Halcyon Robotics & Westmark
MATERIAL CONTRACTS  ·  MSA  ·  47 PP  ·  38 FIELDS EXTRACTED
Reviewed
Counterparty
Westmark Logistics LLC p. 1 §1
Governing law
New York p. 41 §14.6
Initial term
3 years, with two 1-year auto-renewals p. 12 §6.1
Change of control
Consent required  —  counterparty may terminate within 30 days p. 24 §8.3
Indemnity cap
$10,000,000 aggregate; uncapped for IP infringement p. 33 §11.4
Assignment
Prohibited without written consent p. 40 §14.2
Auto-renewal notice
90 days before end of then-current term p. 12 §6.2
AC Reviewed by Alex Chen · 2 days ago v3 · accepted
Diligence request list — Atlas
CORPORATE & STRUCTURAL  ·  16 OF 22 ITEMS
In progress
Certificate of Incorporation (current and amendments)
3 docs
Bylaws / Operating Agreement
2 docs
Cap table as of execution date
1 doc
Stockholder consents — 18 months
2 missing
Foreign qualifications & good-standing certificates
8 docs
Board minutes — past 18 months
requested
Officer & director roster
1 doc
Powers of attorney
awaiting
Related-party transactions
4 docs
73% complete
16 / 22
The other things it does

Built for the work that's
actually hard.

Categorization is the easy half. The work that actually moves a deal is what's below: questions answered with citations, comparison across the whole deal, an audit trail you can defend.

FIND WHAT MATTERS · SKIP WHAT DOESN'T

23 to read.
24 you can skip.

Pick a clause: change-of-control trigger, IP carve-out, anti-dilution adjustment. Ciceri checks every contract, lists the ones that have one, and shows the extracted consequence right there. Search the full text too, when you need it. Every contract gets checked; only the ones that need a lawyer land on your desk.

Field · Change-of-control trigger + filter 23 of 47
Document Consequence Source
MSA — Halcyon & Westmark Consent required p. 24 §8.3
Distribution — Hauge AS Termination right p. 11 §4.2
Software License — Cresswell Termination (Licensor) p. 7 §3.1
JV Agreement — Marigold Labs Buyout option p. 16 §5.4
+ 19 more · all 47 contracts checked · sort by consequence
AGENTIC SEARCH · ASK IN PLAIN ENGLISH

Ask like you'd ask
an associate.

Type the question the way you'd say it out loud. The search agent turns it into a filter you can see, plain chips you can read and edit, and runs it across the deal. No black box. Every row is a real document; every value is cited. One click saves it as a view your whole team shares.

“unsigned contracts governed by New York law, newest first” 6 of 312
Signature · Unsigned Governing law · New York Sorted · newest first
Document Governing law Source
Supply Agreement — Ridgeway Materials New York p. 28 §12.1
Consulting Agreement — Brill & Mercer New York p. 9 §10.2
SOW #4 — Westmark Logistics New York p. 6 §9.1
agent-built filter · edit any chip · saved as view “NY · unsigned”
PER-DEAL ACCESS · ETHICAL WALLS BUILT IN

Walled by deal,
not by firm.

Permissions live on the deal, not the firm: View, Edit, Approve, Export, Delete, Access, each granted per member. A buyer-side partner can't see, search, or get alerts on the seller-side deal in the same firm's account. Ciceri refuses to remove the last admin, so the deal can't lock itself out. Every grant on the record.

Member View Edit Approve Export Delete Access
AC Alex ChenPartner
MR Maya RaoSenior
JP Jordan ParkJunior
SK Sara KhanParalegal
Can't lock yourself out. Removing Alex would leave Project Atlas with no one who can grant access, so Ciceri refuses to do it.
SORT, FILTER, COMPARE ACROSS THE WHOLE DEAL

The clause you're looking for, in every document that has one.

Indemnity caps from every contract. Governing-law clauses by counterparty. Change-of-control consequences by trigger. Every extracted value, comparable across the whole deal in one filterable, sortable view, whatever the document type.

Field · Indemnity cap + filter sorted by cap ↓
Document Cap Carve-out
MSA — Halcyon Robotics & Westmark $10,000,000 IP infringement uncapped
Distribution — Hauge Distribusjon AS $5,000,000 mutual
Software License — Cresswell $2,500,000 one-way (Licensor)
Reseller — Westmark APAC $1,000,000 capped at fees paid
+ 19 more · export to xlsx
FIRM-WIDE FIELD LIBRARY

Define the field once. Reuse it on every deal.

Change-of-control consequence on every MSA. Assignment restriction on every lease. Anti-dilution adjustment on every stock purchase. Every field your firm tracks, defined once and run on every deal. Every team starts from the same place, and the disclosure schedule stops depending on who staffed the deal.

Change-of-control consequence
MSA 47 docs
Assignment restriction
Lease 12 docs
Anti-dilution adjustment
SPA 8 docs
409A valuation date
Equity Plan 3 docs
+ define a new field
applies to every future deal
AUDIT TRAIL, BY DEFAULT

Every override, on the record.

Every approval, every override, every export is recorded with the person, the timestamp, and the value before and after. The trail builds itself as you work; nobody reconstructs it the night before a deposition.

14:02 AC Alex Chen accepted AI category Material Contracts for MSA — Halcyon Robotics & Westmark
14:11 MR Maya Rao overrode field Indemnity cap from $8,000,000$10,000,000
14:34 AC Alex Chen approved 38 fields on MSA — Halcyon Robotics & Westmark
15:07 SK Sara Khan exported Schedule 3.11(a) — Material Contracts to xlsx · 312 rows
15:42 MR Maya Rao granted Edit permission to Jordan Park
0
Same workflow, any deal size. A carve-out and a take-private run the same way. There is no document limit per deal.
0%
Of extracted contract terms carry the verbatim passage behind them. Click, read, defend.
0
Customer documents used to train a model. Yours are processed to answer your questions, nothing else, nowhere else.
0
Default categories tuned to corporate & M&A. Use them, or replace them with your firm's.
Lawyers are trained to exercise judgment.
They are not trained, and should not be paid, to be a clerk.
The technology to fix this exists. The product, until now, has not.
From the Ciceri founding memo — January 2026
Why you should trust us

Quietly uncompromising
on the parts that matter.

Confidentiality. Defensibility. The right of a lawyer to override the model. These are the parts we spent the most time on. They were settled before the first feature shipped, and settled on the side of the partner who has to defend the work.

Confidentiality, by construction.

No document, no search result, no notification ever crosses from one firm's account into another. We test that boundary on every change; nothing that fails goes live.

Grounded in the source.

Every AI-extracted term links to the document and passage it came from, where you can read it and override it. When the model isn't sure (a rough scan, an odd margin note), the value goes to a human to set rather than being guessed.

Human in every loop.

A lawyer sets the final answer. Ciceri proposes; counsel disposes. Once you've reviewed a document, the system honors that decision, even if the model updates later.

Your data stays yours.

Encrypted at rest and in transit using current industry standards. Never used to train models, ours or our vendors'. Your documents don't leave your account, and they don't make anyone else's product smarter.

Conflicts, contained.

Access is per-deal, not per-firm. A partner on the buyer side cannot see, search, or be alerted on the seller-side deal living in the same firm's account. Ethical walls that hold by permission, not by accident.

Built to leave.

If you leave, you get your documents and your extractions back in a format you can use. Your work product goes with you.

What it isn't

Things we don't do.

Worth being clear about the perimeter. None of these are on the roadmap; none are coming. They're not in scope, by design.

We don't draft contracts.

Or markup, or redline. Ciceri reads. Your team writes.

We don't give legal advice.

The model proposes; the lawyer decides. Every output is reviewable and overridable on the way to the export.

We don't replace your lawyer.

We change where they start the morning. The first pass is done by sunrise; the lawyer's day begins at the analysis, not the index.

We don't pretend the model is always right.

Models are wrong sometimes. Sources are scanned sometimes. The workflow knows it, flags it, and asks a human. No silent guesses.

Pricing

One unit of AI work.
One line on the report.
Pass it through to the client.

We charge for AI work. Categorizing a document, extracting a field, or running a query costs one Diligence Unit (DU), at one flat rate we share when we onboard you. No seats, no platform fee, no minimums.

1
flat rate · every DU

No volume tiers. No per-seat fees. The price your two-attorney boutique sees is the price your 800-attorney firm sees.

30
days to try it

Try before you buy. Run a small deal end-to-end before you commit. Walk away during the trial and owe nothing. No procurement gauntlet.

0
invoices in arrears

Pre-paid balance, transparent decrement. We never bill you for something you've already used.

PASS-THROUGH BILLING

Every deal carries a usage report: one line per AI call, tied to a specific document. Flat per-unit pricing keeps ABA 93-379-style pass-through math simple for your billing team. No volume tiers, no end-of-year true-ups, nothing to disentangle. The bill you send the client is the bill we sent you.

What lawyers ask

Questions a partner will ask in the first ten minutes.

Six of them. If yours isn't here, write to us and we'll add it.

Is AI output defensible?
Extracted terms are cited to the passage they came from, with a location and a verbatim quote, and a reviewer can read the source in one click. The full chain of AI proposed → human approved → exported is logged with timestamps. You stand behind the export the way you always have, except now every cell has its source behind it.
What about confidentiality?
Your firm's documents live behind your firm's walls. They don't travel between firms. They don't get piped into model training. They're encrypted both at rest (AES-256) and in transit (TLS 1.3). And every action on every document is logged with the person, the timestamp, and the value before and after.
How does this pass through to the client bill?
DUs are flat-rate, attributed to a specific deal, exportable as a per-deal billing report. Each line is one AI call. Hand it to the client as a pass-through disbursement. No volume tiers to disentangle, no end-of-year true-ups. The bill you send the client is the bill we sent you.
What happens when the model is wrong?
Often the model knows it isn't sure. It puts the document in a review queue with the candidate answers and its reasoning, and a human picks. Sometimes it's confidently wrong, which is why every value carries a citation. Click it, read the source passage, set the right answer. Verification is one motion. The change is logged with the actor, the timestamp, and the value before and after.
Can I bring co-counsel or the client into a deal?
Not yet. Bringing co-counsel from another firm, or the client's GC, into a single deal with explicit permissions is on our list, and we intend to build it properly. Today a deal lives inside one firm. Tell us if that's a dealbreaker for your practice and we'll keep you posted.
Where is our data stored?
Google Cloud, US data centers. Every document and every extracted value stays inside your firm's account, encrypted at rest and in transit. Your data goes nowhere we haven't agreed it goes.
Why we built it

We started Ciceri because we'd done diligence ourselves and watched the same absurdity repeat on every deal: a roomful of trained lawyers, billed at full rate, spending their first week doing the work of a clerk.

The technology to fix this has existed for a while. The product hasn't. Nobody had built one around the facts of the job: a lawyer defends every answer, confidentiality is non-negotiable, and the model is sometimes wrong, so the workflow has to know it.

So we built it.

Private beta · now onboarding

Diligence,
at last.

If the first pass is eating your team's week, we'd like to show you what we've built. Twenty minutes. We'll do the talking.